Enemy Difficulty Selection at Beginning of game... (BnW3)

drakenx9

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
150
I think it would be cool in Black & White 3 "If they make it" for them to make it so you have to select an enemies difficulty at the begining of the game.
Like they would ask you how quick the enemy should go... and the options being:
Slow, Medium, Fast.
And it would also be cool if you could set the enemies difficulty.... By that i mean how much armies they make at a time, breeders, etc.
The options i think should be:
Easy, Normal, Medium, Hard, Very Hard.
That would be great for BnW3....
Anyone else agree? =D
 
1. Not to burst your bubble but B&W3 is probably not ever being made, ever. If you didn't already know that
and 2. No, I think it would ruin the fun, you could just set easy on everything and zip on by on every level. They should make the enemy moderately hard depending on what level you are on, for example final level= Super hard boss.
 
Should they ever get to doing a BW3 I think that it's a good idea.

BW2 was way too easy and it would be nice to be able to set difficulty level. Especially for the enemy
 
I agree with Kays that B&W2 was too easy, but I don't think you should be able to set the difficulty...

if only lionhead would make black and white 3 instead of thier dimitri project...
 
If BW3 is ever getting made then i hope it there will be Easy, Normal, Hard
There must be a world that you can manipulate instead of just an island, and you shouldnt be able to give your armys direct hints, for example, when a general is praying for guidance you would have to tell him to attack or something, BW2 was hilariously stupid (don't lynch me yet) i mean giving orders and stuff doesnt make sence, your a god and not a general, the people should be able to build on their own, and go to war on their own.
Also a skirmish would be nice.


those are my idea's
 
i mean giving orders and stuff doesnt make sence, your a god and not a general

Yep.. That's something I've always wondered about. As a god you should influence, not direct.
 
yea, I think that when you torture your people, it should inspire them to go to war, but you control the size of the army by encouraging young children to become soldiers by somehow 'putting ideas into thier minds'
 
zypher said:
yea, I think that when you torture your people, it should inspire them to go to war, but you control the size of the army by encouraging young children to become soldiers by somehow 'putting ideas into thier minds'
the manipulating the enviroment and all that is actually sounding kinda cool.
 
what does that have to do with quoteing me?

and, I don't think there should be an entire world, it would be too cahotic, and with black and white 2's level of detail, you'd probably need a supercomputer to run it...

besides, I think it's just way more fun to throw people way into the ocea!  :D
 
there should be a custom settings menu like in civilisation 4 to make the platoons bigger eg. patrols of 200 instead of 20 men, standing armies of 1000 ar 2000 depending on the city size, and less "raiding party" and more "all out attack". it doesnt make sense for a huge city to attack another with only 20 men. and i swear lionhead promised armies of "10000 men in each battle" (see black and white 2 pre release FAQs)

btw, "influencing" people to go to war, breed, build etc should come in bw4 or 5 when you are in the present day and people make desicions for themselves.

i would like to see bw5 being a first person game.
 
anglosaxon said:
there should be a custom settings menu like in civilisation 4 to make the platoons bigger eg. patrols of 200 instead of 20 men, standing armies of 1000 ar 2000 depending on the city size, and less "raiding party" and more "all out attack". it doesnt make sense for a huge city to attack another with only 20 men. and i swear lionhead promised armies of "10000 men in each battle" (see black and white 2 pre release FAQs)

btw, "influencing" people to go to war, breed, build etc should come in bw4 or 5 when you are in the present day and people make desicions for themselves.

i would like to see bw5 being a first person game.
THAT'S JUST FARRR OUUUUT DUUUUDE...
I doubt their even making a third. XP
 
one thing i have about the custom maps in this site is that the platoons are too small. the rest of them is great though - and i think that some of you guys did better than lionhead in making challenging maps with about 300 men in each map (cresent, greenpatch2.0, pond island and three corners are the best.).

i laugh in land 6 when the huge "minas tirith" city sends out a group of 20 suicidal samurai to attack me. its stupid and gives me no chance of improving my own soldiers. by the time my armies have reached a respectable level, the game ends.

well thats my moan over. anyone agree with me?
 
anglosaxon said:
one thing i have about the custom maps in this site is that the platoons are too small. the rest of them is great though - and i think that some of you guys did better than lionhead in making challenging maps with about 300 men in each map (cresent, greenpatch2.0, pond island and three corners are the best.).

i laugh in land 6 when the huge "minas tirith" city sends out a group of 20 suicidal samurai to attack me. its stupid and gives me no chance of improving my own soldiers. by the time my armies have reached a respectable level, the game ends.

well thats my moan over. anyone agree with me?
That would be cool if they made a mmog of BnW... and yes... I agree. it must suck beating the game and having to start all over again. It's kinda dumb.  :(
 
Back
Top